gorme
New Member
Posts: 3
|
Post by gorme on Jan 12, 2012 22:20:35 GMT -5
Hi, I didn't realize no one else had seen the new Crown Face image. You can see more on this at my web site: www.ultor.org/Note you can download a copy of the book for free in PDF or AZW format which works well in ebook readers. The links are at the top pf the page. One of the big discoveries for me was possibly the actual builder of the Crowned Face may have made a self portrait. This is quite tiny and only comes up in the HiRise image and is nearly opposite the Crowned Face. It looks like he may be holding some kind of camera or torch in his outstretched right hand. www.ultor.org/Martian_Artist.htm
|
|
|
Post by marsrocks on Jan 13, 2012 11:56:20 GMT -5
Good to see you on a message board, and thank you for writing this book, and making it available to us! I will definitely be reading it.
I am pretty well astonished by your statement on your website, below, when I consider how meticulous you are about evidence, and ruling out non-artificial possibilities.
"For the first time I assert that artificiality on Mars is proven."
!!!
When you say this, do you mean "extraordinary proof," of the kind required by Sagan?
Wow!
|
|
gorme
New Member
Posts: 3
|
Post by gorme on Jan 18, 2012 22:18:20 GMT -5
Hi Marsrocks, What I mean is I have never before said there existed actual proof as opposed to evidence of artificiality on mars. proof is something quite different, it means that it is impossible to be wrong like a proof in mathematics. Even while the evidence for artificiality has been very strong it is quite difficult to prove that natural phenomena cannot create the same shapes. For example we see faces in clouds so it is hard to prove that random wind and erosion cannot create faces on Mars. However until there is proof it's unlikely mainstream science will pay much attention to this because it would hurt a scientist's career to be seen as too fringe in his views.
So in this book I only tried to present actual proof by showing that the natural hypothesis simply doesn't explain the evidence. That is, geological weathering etc cannot produce these shapes at all, so that only leaves artificiality as an alternative.
Some of this for example is by showing the Cydonia Face, the 3 Crowned Faces, and the Meridiani Face are so similar in their features that the odds are simply impossible to occur by chance. Imagine all the atoms in the universe and each atom being another universe and all the atoms in each of those. Then pick on of those atoms randomly and I happen to pick the same one you did. What's the chance that happened just by luck? I'm maintaining that is more likely to happen than the similarities between these 5 faces.
But also some other parts of these faces are impossible to occur naturally, for example looking at the details in the Crowned Face eyes and nostrils in the HiRise image, the wind would produce rounded shapes, no meteor crater could make these, the nose should have eroded off and collapsed and the nostrils could never form under it by meteor impacts, etc.
Greg.
|
|
|
Post by Amber Ramhorn on Feb 17, 2012 10:35:34 GMT -5
Hi Greg. Thanks for the link to your book. I'll get back to you as soon as I start reading it.
AR
|
|