An archaeological discovery in Atlantis Chaos.

[George J. Haas]

Here is how I see the shapes and forms of the polygonal features observed within the Southern Complex of Atlantis Chaos (Figure 36) as compared to what Michael Craig submitted.


Figure 36
Southern Complex of Polygonal Features
Left: Michael J. Craig
Right: George J. Haas



GJH

[Javed Raza]

Here is a comparison of Atlantis Chaos, Arrowhead mound; Hollow Hills, Arrowhead formation and the Arrowhead structure at Monte Alban, figure 37.


Figure 37
Arrowhead comparison
A:  Atlantis Chaos
B:  Hollow Hills
C:  Monte Alban 

[williamsaunders]

Javed Raza's "city" is very interesting as the grid pattern is smaller and well defined in the area that could be by the former edge of a water body. As you move outward, the grid patterning gets larger. This fits with most urban settings as the busiest areas are more concentrated, and as you move away, you get the larger settings of acreages, farms, industrial, etc. This larger grid pattern is also not as sharp or well defined suggesting it could have been abandoned sooner due to hard times and the population concentrating in the urban center.



The geometric structures are also very interesting as they all seem to have a "walled" outline to them. These "walls" run in different directions indicating that they were either constructed or that they are remnants of geologic intrusions. I don't, however, notice anything within them that looks constructed. The faint grid lines within could be horizontal and vertical fracturing. 

Great find Javed Raza and an area well worth more study.

[Javed Raza]

Aug 22, 2019 13:12:39 GMT -5 williamsaunders said:

Javed Raza's "city" is very interesting as the grid pattern is smaller and well defined in the area that could be by the former edge of a water body. As you move outward, the grid patterning gets larger. This fits with most urban settings as the busiest areas are more concentrated, and as you move away, you get the larger settings of acreages, farms, industrial, etc. This larger grid pattern is also not as sharp or well defined suggesting it could have been abandoned sooner due to hard times and the population concentrating in the urban center.



The geometric structures are also very interesting as they all seem to have a "walled" outline to them. These "walls" run in different directions indicating that they were either constructed or that they are remnants of geologic intrusions. I don't, however, notice anything within them that looks constructed. The faint grid lines within could be horizontal and vertical fracturing. 

Great find Javed Raza and an area well worth more study.

Thanks Williamsaunders,
What is holding the "city" back from having a larger impact is the uncertainty as to whether the gridded structures, despite them showing sufficient depth, are natural formations. What is needed in my view is people with backgrounds in digital image processing and geology to take this up for further analysis, thank you for your comments.

[starjim]

MJCraig I wanted to comment on the measurements side of your post.

First I always want to know the size of structures. Many posters simply make observations and when the object is actually measured it can and often does change the observation. What I struggle with is picking the start and ending points and like you have mentioned, realize that others will "see" different aspects that change the overall sizing. In the case of these very detailed images a pixel here or there is extremely important. With MGS for example a pixel would be 6' to 10' at the better resolutions. Now resolutions are vastly improved.

So looking at your measurements above the B, D and G structures hold the most interest for me. George Haas saw both similarly shaped. This is when an old partner Wil Faust who was a city planner would come in very handy, regarding the relationships between the structures. I looked at structures C & D and think one could even make a case for them being one large building. I do see G as a partial triangle, I think the long tip is actually squared off, and doesn't come to a point.

Let's look at locations like Maya ruins or Teotihuacan. We see one or two centrally located structures usually about the same size as the anchor points. The rest of the structures are downsized, the purpose being to not diminish the importance of the main structures.

On Mars itself we have Cydonia which features many structures that in and of themselves exhibit mathematical relationships and the Golden Mean is a main aspect of the structures and the groupings. Like you say, that is for actual mathematicians to measure and interpret.

In this case we see structures that are generally of two sizes: 1/2 mile and 1 mile in size across the longest points, using your image and measurements. Mars seems to love big buildings and this area is no exception.

My comment on a relationship between the buildings due to a potentially repeating size, simply would be, that is the size Martians commonly build. Makes me think of the Nifilim, Marduk etc. biblical giants. Nice observations overall, thanks for that work.

[George J. Haas]

Here is a comparison of the Atlantic Chaos City complex with an ancient Mayan city that was discovered in Petén, Guatemala, in 2015 (Figure 38). Notice the city complex is built within a grid design that contains conical and flat-topped pyramids...dating to around 600 BC.


Figure 38
Grid City comparison
Left:Atlantic Chaos
Right: Petén, Guatemala


GJH

[Javed Raza]

I have been looking for an earthly reference to the "tessellation" observed in the terrain that rises above the City grid.  "The site of Kemune on the eastern Tigris can be dated to the time of the Mittani Empire, which dominated large parts of northern Mesopotamia and Syria from the 15th to the 14th century BCE, decreasing water levels in the Mosul Dam reservoir due to draughts unexpectedly brought to light remains of an ancient city.  The area had been flooded following the construction of the Mosul Dam in the mid-1980s."


Figure 39
City tessellation comparison
Top: Atlantis Chaos
Bottom: kemune Palace

[Javed Raza]

Here is another comparison of the Atlantis Chaos City grid with a 9,000-year-site in Motza near Jerusalem.


Figure 40
Grid City comparison
Top: Atlantis Chaos
Bottom: Motza, Israel

[George J. Haas]

Returning back to the Northern Complex of Atlantis Chaos I direct your attention to a triangle-shaped pyramidal formation with a bow-tie shaped ramp (Figure 41).



Figure 41
Triangle Pyramid with Bow-Tie Ramp
Notated with circle.
Detail MRO HiRISE ESP_019103_1460 (2010)

Here is a comparison with an outlined guide (Figure 42). Notice the triangular-shaped formation appears to be conjoined with a bow-tie formation, that extends out like a ramp.


Figure 42
Triangle Pyramid with Bow-Tie Ramp
Left:Triangle Pyramid with Bow-Tie Ramp
Detail MRO HiRISE ESP_019103_1460 (2010)
Right: Outlined

GJH

[Javed Raza]

Here is an updated enhancement of the City in Atlantis Chaos.


Figure 43
MRO HiRISE ESP_019103_1460 (2010)

[George J. Haas]

A large face (Figure 44) has been discovered just above the "city" complex by independent researcher Ennio Piccaluga.


Figure 44
City Face

GJH

[Javed Raza]

The left eye of the City Face shows a round detail. The right eye does not appear to match the size or the style of the left eye.

Figure 45
City face

[Javed Raza]

A metric grid of the City, each square is one by one metre, this was sent to me by Neville Thompson. According to this the City Face is 3 by 3 metres.

Figure 46
MRO HiRISE ESP_019103_1460 (2010)

[George J. Haas]

The facial features of the mask found near the city at Atlantis Chaos appears to have Mesoamerican aspects. Here is a comparison with two Pre-Columbian masks (Figure 47).


Figure 47
Comparison of Atlantis Chaos Mask with mesoamerican masks
Left:Mayan mask
Center:Atlantis Chaos Mask
Right:Teotihuacan stone mask


Notice the flat forehead of the first mask on the left and the horizontal "flayed" bands on the second mask on the right.

GJH

[George J. Haas]

Hi Javed.

As I measure the Atlantis Chaos Mask - it is about 30 meters wide and 50 meters in length (including chin and forehead). That's about 98 feet wide and 164 feet in length. To get a better perspective, note the head of George Washington at Mount Rushmore is only 60 feet tall.


GJH