The problem to draw a cherubim is that creature does have 4 faces in a single head rather than 4 heads. Considering the paper is bidimensional and flat like any painting on a wall, ancient civilizations solved the problem like Hare Krishna adding PROFILE faces or a head above the others. The 4th face which is BEHIND is always lacking. Now, you need to use CUBISM art of Picasso to represent the figure in movement like someone moving arms and the head and remaining STILL in a photograph pic, like trying to shoot movement of humming bird wings or a propeller in a fan. Picasso on the other hand was influenced by Chavin Peruvian culture. Other way to do that is doing ghostly creatures like Francis Picabia Dadaism or depicting the faces of the cherubim as seen in an angle a lit bit from above, like these: fotolog.terra.com.mx/inca:47 fotolog.terra.com.mx/inca:49 Flavius Josephus, 2000 years ago admitted as a clever Jew who was an erudite, that no one knew the shape of the cherubim above the ark of the covenant. Considering Ezekiel’s description I believe it was more like a sphinx with the 4 faces of the single head and not like “angels” who are humanized. Check this: fotolog.terra.com.mx/inca:15
Isaiah 6:1-6 admits the ones closer to God’s throne were SERAPHIM but Christians do not seem to acknowledge these are WINGED-SNAKES and that’s why Apocalypse 12 compares the original snake with a DRAGON. More than that, Genesis 3 is not dealing with a earthy reptile “nahash” but a SERAPHIM “hanashash” as studied by one of the few scholars in Hebrew and Sumerian, Michael Heiser. These winged-snakes have feet and hands and they are mentioned in Isaiah. Arabs know they are the ones closer to God’s throne: fotolog.terra.com.mx/inca:20 The Shekinah cloud represented God’s presence and we need to remember the Seraphim were closer to God’s throne while the hum-animal cherubim were BELOW them and closer to the Onanim wheels within wheels which is also some movement in the universe but also is related with real invisible creatures.
It seems the cocky feathered snake was reduced in rank. Is it possible he became a cherubim and had a metamorphosis? The image provided by O.P also includes the snake as if “below” the cherubim which is a deception created by the ones who allowed the sculpture as seen from earth.
IS THIS RELEVANT TO STUDY MARS? Indeed because art mimics reality and reality is not just the art on earth but everything that inspires the art in first place. We can't draw or interpret the metaphysical world unless you know something about the physical realms. If you are not aware there are 2-faced cats and bulls or animals which shine green fluorescent light when lit by ultraviolet light, you maybe missing something important that later on could be awefully interpreted as "archetype" or symbol which are the words quoted when specialists are completely ignorant!
This also can be applied to "constellations" where Lion Leo resembles whatever, a hanger BUT a real lion or Taurus bull which looks something that barely resembles horns or feet even if you draw the line between finger picked stars in specific way, areas which for different civilizations could be seen in different shapes but USUALLY hybrid hum-animals. They were not worshipping realms of the gods or their houses but THEIR HYBRID GODS!
Last Edit: Oct 2, 2011 17:02:35 GMT -5 by chinitial
Post by MarsRevealer on Oct 28, 2011 23:52:05 GMT -5
Hey Done?? I am lettin ya know I am USING THAT QUOTE from Ezekeil you posted at the top of this topic. You have NO IDEA HOW RIGHT ON IN CODE,... THIS FITS TO WHAT i AM SEEING & DOING & WHAT IS TRYING TO BE SAID... ESPECIALLY TO HOAGLAND! Thank You! :-)